TABLE 4.

Predicting Consistent Condom Use of FBWs by Intervention Condition

	Legaspi: Peer Education (n = 150)	Cagayan de oro: Manager Training (n = 202)	Cebu: Combined (n = 418)	Ilo-Ilo: Control (n = 141)
	Coef.	Coef.	Coef.	Coef.
Cognitive Variables
HIV knowledge (ref = low)	-0.09	-0.001	.19**	0.06
Self-esteem (ref = low)	-0.04	0.02	-0.06	0.02
Intervention process-related variables
Attended a regular establishment meeting (ref = no)	.35*	-0.72	-0.18	0.12
Discussed establishment condom use rules/regulations in the meeting (ref = no)	-0.54	-0.40	0.21	0.07
Attended a prevention class (ref = no)	0.27	0.65	.53**	.96***
Felt that the attended prevetntion class was useful (ref = no)	.76*	.73*	-0.28	-0.04
Felt that the attended prevention class increased their own condom use (ref = no)	-0.25	0.09	1.49***	-0.10
Ever been taught to use condoms properly (ref = no)	.72*	.82***	1.29***	.85**
Proper condom use taught by medical professionals (ref = no)	1.00**	.57**	1.21***	1.02**
Manager-related variables
The manager ever:
Attended a community HIV meeting (ref = no)	0.13	0.28	0.37	0.16
Attended an HIV prevention class (ref = no)	-0.23	-0.27	0.20	0.36
Implemented an HIV prevention class for workers (ref = no)	-0.57	0.08	1.36*	-0.01

Note. FBWs – female bar workers.

^*p < .05.

^**p < .01.

^***p < .001.