Skip to main content
. 2011 May;17(5):441–452. doi: 10.1089/acm.2010.0457

Table 3.

Results from Delphi Round 2

Domain Statement no. Item Agree % Not applicable Disagree %
1 1 The research question of the study needs to be clearly described in terms of population 92.9 (26)   7.1 (2)
  2 The research question of the study needs to be clearly described in terms of intervention 100 (28)   0
  3 The research question of the study needs to be clearly described in terms of comparator 92.9(26)   7.1 (2)
  4 The research question of the study needs to be clearly described in terms of outcome 100 (28)   0
2 5 The study design is appropriate for the research question 100 (28)   0
3 6 The active intervention is justified by a description of the diagnosis and treatment as per the stated acupuncture paradigm 96.3 (26)   3.7 (1)
4 7 The acupuncture intervention is designed to address the research question 96.4 (27)   3.6 (1)
5 8 Justification of the diagnostic process is provided, by evidence linking to the treatment paradigm 92.9 (26)   7.1 (2)
  9 Justification of the diagnostic process is provided by evidence linking to clinical reasoning 96.4 (27)   3.6 (1)
6 10 Acupuncture points needled are consistent with differential diagnosis 92.3 (24)   7.7 (2)
  11 Acupuncture points needled are consistent with treatment paradigm 96.3 (26)   3.7 (1)
  12 Acupuncture points needled are consistent based on literature review or other evidence 88.9 (24)   11.1 (3)
7 13 Preference is given to a minimum of six needle sites per treatment. If fewer points (e.g., PC6) are used, justification is presented linking to the treatment paradigm 71.4 (20)   28.6 (8)
8 14 Needle brand and gauge is used consistently across all patients. (Please note that this question is less appropriate for pragmatic and effectiveness studies, select N/A) 60.7 (17) 25 (7) 14.3 (4)
9 15 Point location: Standard acupuncture location texts are used as reference or location described in anatomical terms 100 (25)   0
  16 Point location: An accurate proportional method for locating acupoints used where appropriate 87.5 (21)   12.5 (3)
10 17 Symmetrical or asymmetrical needling sites are justified according to the clinical condition 96.2 (25)   3.8 (1)
11 18 Depth of needle insertion expressed in millimeters is referenced to a standard text 83.3 (20)   16.7 (4)
  19 Depth of needle insertion expressed in millimeters is expressed as a range 87.5 (21)   12.5 (3)
12 20 Needle retention: Minimum time of 20 minutes unless justification presented reflecting a different acupuncture paradigm 78.6 (22)   21.4 (6)
13 21 Number of treatments: If a chronic condition a minimum of six treatments are administered, if fewer treatments are delivered appropriate justification is documented 88.9 (24)   11.1 (3)
  22 Number of treatments: If an acute or subacute condition, no minimum of treatments are specified, but appropriate justification is to be provided 96.3 (26)   3.7 (1)
14 23 A minimum of two treatments per week are administered unless justified by treatment parameters relating to the treatment paradigm 59.3 (16)   40.7 (11)
15 24 Needle manipulation must be standardized and/or applied at least once during the treatment session. Manipulation should be expressed in terms of the rotational degrees or depth of lift and thrust (mm) of the needle 54.9 (14) 22.9 (6) 25.9 (7)
  25 Needle manipulation must be standardized and/or applied at least once during the treatment session. Manipulation should be expressed in terms of the duration (seconds) of needle manipulation 51.9 (14) 18.5 (5) 29.6 (8)
  26 Needle manipulation must be standardized and/or applied at least once during the treatment session. Manipulation should be expressed in terms of the number of times the needle was manipulated 71.4 (20) 17.9 (5) 10.7 (3)
  27 In the absence of needle manipulation, justification is provided of the decision not to undertake needle manipulation 88.9 (24) 7.4 (2) 3.7 (1)
16 28 Electro-acupuncture machine should demonstrate approval status and compliance for the country where study is being undertaken.a 70.4 (19) 22.2 (6) 7.4 (2)
17 29 The level of patient stimulation response that was sought (e.g., subsensory threshold, suprasensory threshold, above motor stimulation)a 73.1 (19) 19.2 (5) 7.7 (2)
  30 Level of stimulation response is justified and appropriate 65.4 (17) 23.1 (6) 11.5 (3)
18 31 The acupuncturist administering intervention is registered with a regulatory authority, or meets at least the minimum WHO standard (WHO 1999) 100 (28)   0
  32 When differential diagnosis is undertaken, evidence is provided that the acupuncturist has undertaken a full training course as per WHO guideline (WHO 1999) 96.3 (26)   3.7 (1)
  33 Evidence is provided of prior clinical training by study personnel relevant to the acupuncture intervention and health condition 92.0 (23)   8.0 (2)
  34 Evidence is provided of monitoring the administration of acupuncture in the clinical trial setting 79.2 (19)   20.8 (5)
a

NA (not applicable) response applied to those unqualified to answer.

WHO, World Health Organization.