Table 2. .

Performance of Correction Methods Without Hits Vs. With Hits Averaged for all Datasets

Correction Method	No Hits		With Hits
	CV (%)	CV/Raw	CV (%)	CV/Raw
Raw Data	16.2	1.0	17.0	1.0
5 × 5 HMF	3.5	0.2	5.0	0.3
3 × 3 median	5.4	0.3	7.3	0.4
SLIMS DFT	5.5	0.3	22.0	1.3
5 × 5 median	9.2	0.6	10.4	0.6

 The average CVs for the datasets are tabulated for experiments without and with simulated hits in the arrays, to further compare the performances of the DFT, 3 × 3 median, 5 × 5 median, and 5 × 5 HMF filters in the experiments of Figure 7A and 7B. CVs with hits were calculated only on non-hit wells.

 Abbreviations: CV, coefficient of variation; HMF, hybrid median filter; DFT, Discrete Fourier Transform; SLIMS, Small Laboratory Information Management System.