TABLE 1.
Factor omitted | Relative toeprinting efficiency (%)
|
|
---|---|---|
bG | Td3 | |
None | 100 | 100 |
eIF4Aa | 73 | 25 |
eIF4Bb | 80 | 20 |
eIF4F | 13 | <10c |
In this case, the system contained ∼110 nM eIF4A as a eIF4F subunit compared to its usual concentration of 550 nM of free eIF4A and 110 nM of eIF4A from eIF4F.
It was not possible to exclude eIF4B completely due to its slight contamination of the eIF4F preparation (final concentration ∼20 nM compared to regular 300 nM).
It's difficult to define an exact value because the relative error is quite large when the signal is only slightly above background.