Table A1.

Estimated parameters of Equation 1 from data for each subject in each condition and test: slope of EvN line (m), equivalent input noise (N_eq = E₀/m), and their 95% confidence interval. The lines corresponding to these parameters are shown in Figure 3

Unflanked
Subject	m (unitless)	95% Confidence interval		Neq (deg2) × 10−5	95% Confidence interval
		Lower bound	Upper bound		Lower bound × 10−5	Upper bound × 10−5
Pre-test
AL	452	401	511	3.21	2.67	3.74
BW	555	489	844	1.89	−1.24	2.05
CT	647	582	720	2.06	1.95	2.54
LM	469	421	519	3.22	2.70	3.32
MB	432	383	510	3.11	2.50	3.90
SL	655	561	1115	2.30	−1.46	2.48
Post-test
AL	359	319	402	3.71	3.25	4.66
BW	514	458	804	2.18	−1.41	2.45
CT	477	426	537	2.33	2.17	2.87
LM	404	353	462	4.11	3.71	5.59
MB	310	280	344	2.83	2.32	2.90
SL	394	351	444	3.22	2.74	3.76
Follow-up test
AL	326	285	373	4.51	3.82	4.71
BW	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA
CT	488	431	551	2.39	2.05	2.38
LM	526	457	601	2.59	2.10	3.06
MB	288	256	328	3.91	3.27	4.46
SL	593	524	867	1.40	−1.04	1.59

Flanked
Subject	m (unitless)	95% Confidence interval		Neq (deg2) × 10−5	95% Confidence interval
		Lower bound	Upper bound		Lower bound × 10−5	Upper bound × 10−5
Pre-test
AL	1756	725	2585	27.5	15.4	73.0
BW	2523	1312	3988	35.9	20.6	79.7
CT	6596	4154	9021	10.1	7.38	18.1
LM	2051	1645	2512	10.9	8.57	18.8
MB	2612	2133	3115	6.59	4.28	8.44
SL	2019	997	3109	39.0	25.7	99.4
Post-test
AL	660	530	801	14.7	12.3	18.5
BW	3658	3097	4227	4.44	3.68	5.65
CT	1461	1196	1785	4.49	2.86	7.08
LM	1269	786	1709	20.2	15.8	40.8
MB	769	648	910	7.08	5.32	8.28
SL	871	686	1070	10.7	7.63	14.3
Follow-up test
AL	998	826	1174	7.13	5.19	9.27
BW	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA
CT	2247	1836	3768	2.17	−1.23	2.61
LM	1731	1334	2147	9.72	8.01	14.8
MB	775	640	927	9.13	7.11	11.0
SL	1865	1587	2166	3.12	2.90	4.37