Skip to main content
. 2011 Apr 7;22(6):637–644. doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1390-7

Table 2.

Successful fitting and dropout rates

Author publication year [reference] Number Study design Initially successful fitting, n (%)a Dropout at follow-up, n (%)b Follow-up in months
Clemons 2004 [24] 100 Prospective 94 (94) 21 (22) 0.5
Brincat 2004 [22] 136 Retrospective Unknown 54 (40) 4
Clemons 2004 [26] 59 Prospective Unknown 16 (27) 12
Mutone 2004 [39] 407 Retrospective 288 (71) 120 (42) 0.75
Powers 2004 [42] 32 Retrospective Unknown 20 (63) Unknown
Broens-Oostveen 2004 [23] 192 Retrospective Unknown 107 (52) 64
Bai 2005 [20] 104 Retrospective Unknown 20 (19) Unknown
Hanson 2005 [30] 1,216 Retrospective 1,043 (86) 299 (29) 3
Fernando 2006 [27] 203 Prospective 203 (100) 106 (52) 4
Barber 2006 [21] 42 Prospective cross-over 42 (100) 0 (0) 3
Maito 2006 [37] 120 Retrospective 103 (86) 11 (11) 6
Cundiff 2007 [6] 134 Randomised cross-over 123 (92) 49 (40) 3
Komesu 2007 [34] 64 Prospective cohort study Unknown 28 (44) 12
Jones 2008 [32] 90 Prospective cohort study Unknown 48 (53) 3
Nager 2009 [40] 255 Randomised controlled trial 235 (92) No follow-up No follow-up
Kuhn 2009 [35] 73 Prospective cohort study Unknown 40 (55) 3
Sarma 2009 [43] 273 Retrospective 167 (61) 144 (86) 84
Friedman 2010 [28] 150 Retrospective Unknown 35 (23) 12
Patel 2010 [41] 75 Prospective cohort study 70 (93) 21 (30) 3
Abdool 2010 [19] 359 Prospective 359 (100) 116 (32) 12

aInitially fitting

bDropout at follow-up