Skip to main content
. 2011 Jan 12;7(3):425–428. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2010.1031

Table 1.

Results of analyses of covariance to explain interspecific variation in immune function for raw data and phylogenetically independent contrasts. Interactions were dropped from the models when p > 0.10, but main effects were always retained.

variables raw data
independent contrasts
d.f. F-value p-value d.f. F-value p-value
(a) ignoring embryonic temperature effects (figure 2a)
inflammatory immune response (error d.f. = 28; R2 = 0.33)
 site 1 1.60 0.22 1 2.99 0.10
 loge body mass 1 18.50 <0.001 1 1.72 0.20
 loge embryonic period 1 2.38 0.13 1 1.59 0.22
natural antibody activity (error d.f. = 28; R2 = 0.20)
 site 1 0.42 0.52 1 0.75 0.39
 loge body mass 1 4.63 0.04 1 0.68 0.42
 loge embryonic period 1 0.18 0.67 1 0.03 0.88
(b) accounting for embryonic temperature effects (figure 2b)
inflammatory immune response (error d.f. = 27; R2 = 0.59)
 site 1 1.29 0.27 1 1.42 0.24
 loge body mass 1 10.43 0.003 1 1.23 0.28
 embryonic temperature 1 11.64 0.002 1 5.95 0.022
 loge embryonic period 1 14.81 0.001 1 7.78 0.010
natural antibody activity (error d.f. = 25; R2 = 0.72)
 site 1 22.32 <0.001 1 2.99 0.096
 loge body mass 1 0.97 0.34 1 1.08 0.31
 embryonic temperature 1 45.98 <0.001 1 12.21 0.002
loge embryonic period 1 33.28 <0.001 1 9.35 0.005
 site × embryonic temperature 1 22.32 <0.001 1 3.54 0.071
 site × loge embryonic period 1 15.59 0.001 1 4.18 0.052