Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Ultrasound Med. 2010 Jul;29(7):1075–1081. doi: 10.7863/jum.2010.29.7.1075

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Ultrasound image quality ratings for 8 cases by two readers. A scale of 1 to 5 was used, where a rating of 1 was equivalent to ‘Much better image quality without rubber dam’ and a rating of 5 was equivalent to ‘Much better image quality with rubber dam’.