Table 2.
range | ML μ | PP μ | ML σ | PP σ | ML FP | PP FP | ML # | PP # |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.0-0.1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 |
0.1-0.2 | 3.67 | 3.94 | 3.23 | 3.31 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 7736 | 3583 |
0.2-0.3 | 3.24 | 3.48 | 3.26 | 3.23 | 0.16 | 0.11 | 17491 | 14308 |
0.3-0.4 | 2.64 | 2.98 | 3.23 | 3.26 | 0.26 | 0.17 | 17000 | 17600 |
0.4-0.5 | 2.51 | 2.46 | 3.30 | 3.11 | 0.33 | 0.25 | 11114 | 14572 |
0.5-0.6 | 2.27 | 2.27 | 3.26 | 3.10 | 0.40 | 0.33 | 8375 | 9894 |
0.6-0.7 | 2.11 | 2.03 | 3.14 | 3.08 | 0.45 | 0.41 | 6921 | 7771 |
0.7-0.8 | 1.83 | 1.76 | 3.06 | 2.98 | 0.52 | 0.50 | 6321 | 6530 |
0.8-0.9 | 1.51 | 1.44 | 2.92 | 2.83 | 0.62 | 0.60 | 7101 | 6873 |
0.9-1.0 | 0.22 | 0.20 | 1.22 | 1.17 | 0.94 | 0.94 | 66910 | 67838 |
Similar analysis as Table 1, but with a normally-distributed length with a mean of 30 amino acids, and a standard deviation of 7. In this case, the posterior probability calculation shows slightly superior ability to distinguish between accurate and inaccurate placements than the likelihood weight ratio.