Skip to main content
. 2011 May 19;6(5):e20113. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020113

Table 4. Identification of the bifidobacterial DGGE band positions by sequencing and the incidence of the bands in secretor (14) and non-secretor samples (57).

Best Blast hit (best cultured hit, similarity) A Band positionB Detected bands % of non-secretors % of secretors
B. longum 53.5% 56 79 79
Uncultured bifidob. (B. adolescentis, 99%) 62.2% 41 50 60
B. adolescentis 26.6% 40 14 67**
not sequenced 17.7% 18 0 32**
B. catenulatum/pseudocatenulatum 63.7% 18 0 32**
B. bifidum 29.7% 17 7 28
not sequenced 20.4% 16 7 26
B. adolescentis 22.3% 13 14 19
Uncultured bifidob. (B. adolescentis/ruminantium, 98–99%) 43.8% 13 14 19
Uncultured bifidob. (B. catenulatum, 99%) 47.3% 9 7 14
Uncultured bifidob. (B. adolescentis, 99%) 55.0% 9 7 14
Uncultured bifidob. (B. ruminantium, 99%) 44.5% 8 7 12
Not sequenced 39.3% 7 7 11
A

The similarity of the best Blast hit for a cultured strain is shown in parentheses, in cases where an uncultured bacterium was the best hit. Detailed data for the identification of each position is shown in table S1. B Only the band positions that were detected at least in 10 % of the samples are shown.** Significant differences: Band positions 26.6%, 17.70% and 63.7% were more frequently detected in secretor than non-secretor samples (Fisher's exact test, p<0.01), and in Lewis b than Lewis a samples (Fisher's exact test, p<0.01 for 17.70% and 26.60% ; p<0.02 for 63.70%).