Table 3.
Subjective Educational Investment and Committed Relationship Status Moderate Sample-wide Prediction of Recent Alcohol Use
Recent Alcohol Use | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Two-week Alcohol Drink Quantity | Two-week Alcohol Drink Frequency (in days) | Two-week Alcohol Drink Duration (in hours) | ||||||||||
B | β | r2 | Δr2 | B | β | r2 | Δr2 | B | β | r2 | Δr2 | |
Step 1 | ||||||||||||
Sex | −11.17* | −.17* | -- | -- | -- | -- | ||||||
Shipley IQ | −4.94* | −.15* | −.43* | −.15* | −2.49* | −.17* | ||||||
MPQ control | −13.95* | −.42* | .23 | -- | −1.21* | −.41* | .20 | -- | −5.58* | −.38* | .19 | -- |
Step 2 | ||||||||||||
Sex | −10.34* | −.15* | -- | -- | -- | -- | ||||||
Shipley IQ | −5.12* | −.15* | −.45* | −.15* | −2.58* | −.17* | ||||||
MPQ control | −12.69* | −.38* | −1.06* | −.36* | −5.03* | −.34* | ||||||
Subjective educational investment | −2.78 | −.08 | −.39 | −.13 | −1.44 | −.10 | ||||||
Committed relationship status | −4.64 | −.07 | .25 | .01 | −.37 | −.06 | .22 | .02 | −1.57 | −.05 | .20 | .01 |
Step 3 | ||||||||||||
Sex | −8.77 | −.13 | -- | -- | -- | -- | ||||||
Shipley IQ | −4.39 | −.13 | −.40* | −.13* | −2.31* | −.16* | ||||||
MPQ control | −12.99* | −.39* | −1.09* | −.37* | −5.16* | −.35* | ||||||
Subjective educational investment | −6.07* | −.18* | −.66* | −.22* | −2.76* | −.19* | ||||||
Committed relationship status | −4.85 | −.07 | −.40 | −.07 | −1.72 | −.06 | ||||||
Subjective educational investment × Committed relationship status | 10.60* | .17* | .27 | .02* | .93* | .17* | .24 | .02* | 4.50* | .17* | .22 | .02* |
Note.
Bs and βs, as well as change in F scores related to corresponding changes in r2 between models, p < .05. Sex scored 0 = male, 1= female. Committed relationship status scored 0 = single, 1 = in a committed relationship. All continuous variables were standardized (z-scored) prior to entry into the models. Bs are interpretable in outcome units (number of drinks, number of days, or number of hours).