Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 May 20.
Published in final edited form as: Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2010 Apr;293(4):572–582. doi: 10.1002/ar.21121

Table 2.

Species means and (standard deviations) for jaw-muscle (a) architectural and (b) EMG variables.

a. Architectural data
Species Group N1 Superficial Masseter Temporalis
Weight (g) Fiber Length (mm) PCSA (cm2) Weight (g) Fiber Length (mm) PCSA (cm2) Condyle – M1 Length3
Treeshrew 5 0.90 (0.36) 8.96 (1.74) 0.95 (0.24) 0.81 (0.32) 8.19 (2.44) 0.76 (0.20) 21.31 (1.30)
Galago 3 / 2 2 2.88 (0.44) 9.19 (1.20) 2.76 (0.45) 2.76 (-) 8.5 (-) - 31.66 (1.76)
Ring-tail Lemur 1 2.41 (-) 9.70 (-) 2.29 (-) 3.89 (-) 10.8 (-) 3.27 (-) 38.20 (1.51)
Marmoset 18 1.10 (0.18) 7.46 (1.22) 1.31 (0.30) 1.53 (0.22) 9.06 (2.02) 1.60 (0.35) 18.48 (0.63)
Owl Monkey 9 2.04 (0.41) 11.08 (2.41) 1.71 (0.23) 2.27 (0.23) 9.98 (1.04) 2.03 (0.10) 26.03 (0.73)
Capuchin 12 5.87 (0.83) 11.56 (1.13) 5.46 (0.75) 14.18 (2.49) 14.29 (1.30) 8.73 (0.99) 42.09 (4.21)
Macaque 6 7.31 (4.22) 11.95 (1.92) 6.76 (1.32) 22.0 (3.46) 17.36 (3.28) 11.99 (1.77) 57.31 (6.41)
Baboon 3 50.67 (18.8) 19.21 (5.82) 23.87 (2.35) 108.67 (45.0) 45.64 (16.7) 21.91 (4.30) 96.11 (11.64)
b. W/B Ratios
Species Group Superficial Masseter W/B Ratio Anterior Temporalis W/B Ratio Posterior Temporalis W/B Ratio
Treeshrew 2.7 2.1 2.0
Galago 2.2 4.4 2.4
Ring-tail Lemur 1.7 1.5 2.0
Marmoset 1.4 1.0 1.1
Owl Monkey 1.4 1.4 1.4
Capuchin 1.3 1.1 1.1
Macaque 1.4 1.2 1.2
Baboon 1.9 1.2 1.0
1

N=sample size. Additionally, not all cadavers possessed both masseter and temporalis muscles.

2

The first number represents masseter sample size based on new data published here while the second number indicates the sample size for temporalis weight and fiber length from Perry and Wall (2008).

3

Condyle-M1 lengths and jaw-muscle architectural variables are not necessarily from the same individuals.