Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 May 20.
Published in final edited form as: Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2010 Apr;293(4):572–582. doi: 10.1002/ar.21121

Table 3.

Product-moment correlations among jaw-muscle architecture and EMG variables for the (a) superficial masseter and (b) temporalis.

a. Masseter
Masseter Variables1 Superficial Masseter W/B Ratio2 Average W/B Ratio
Weight0.333 / Condyle-M1 -0.02 (0.96) 0.02 (0.97)
Fiber Length / Condyle-M1 0.19 (0.66) 0.12 (0.78)
PCSA0.5 / Condyle-M1 -0.32 (0.44) -0.23 (0.58)
b. Temporalis
Temporalis Variables Anterior Temporalis W/B Ratio3 Posterior Temporalis W/B Ratio Average W/B Ratio
Weight0.333 / Condyle-M1 -0.50 (0.20) -0.75 (0.03) -0.66 (0.08)
Fiber Length / Condyle-M1 -0.48 (0.23) -0.62 (0.10) -0.46 (0.25)
PCSA0.5 / Condyle-M1 -0.82 (0.02) -0.71 (0.07) -0.85 (0.02)
1

Abbreviations: Weight = Jaw-muscle weight, Condyle-M1 = Condyle to M1 length, PSCA = Physiological Cross-Sectional Area.

2

Product-moment correlations are followed by the p-value in parentheses.

3

Bolded correlations are significant at α=0.05. Italicized correlations indicate p-values < 0.1 suggesting trends at the small sample sizes.