Skip to main content
. 2010 Apr;8(2):152–174. doi: 10.1089/adt.2009.0247

Appendix Table 1. .

Comparison of the Concentration-Dependent Generation of H2O2 by Compounds in Different Reducing Agents

Compounds
DTT
TCEP
GSH
HBSS
PubChem-SID % Activation at 50 μM AC50 μM % Activation at 50 μM AC50 μM % Activation at 50 μM AC50 μM % Activation at 50 μM AC50 μM
14727570 134.74 <0.01 171.40 25.30 3.60 >50 0.80 >50
14727734 115.48 0.19 3.99 >50 −0.60 >50 1.80 >50
22404392 128.95 0.43 53.25 48.70 3.30 >50 1.00 >50
16952991 109.74 0.72 1.70 >50 2.50 >50 0.50 >50
14723875 111.50 0.90 86.65 23.10 2.50 >50 6.70 >50
845167 112.80 0.90 57.30 37.90 2.40 >50 1.80 >50
11532976 121.55 1.48 157.10 4.10 2.70 >50 1.40 >50
24809205 110.69 1.51 68.60 25.50 4.30 >50 1.50 >50
24814503 127.08 2.73 19.80 >50 1.10 >50 1.10 >50
14726526 114.91 2.76 91.89 6.80 2.90 >50 2.50 >50
14730721 114.50 2.88 0.00 >50 1.40 >50 0.70 >50
24809506 116.49 3.11 16.60 >50 3.00 >50 1.50 >50
14742005 78.78 6.44 0.10 >50 3.10 >50 0.60 >50
847359 133.23 7.85 110.00 >50 1.40 >50 0.90 >50
17507336 123.59 9.42 5.70 >50 0.40 >50 0.10 >50
14719117 107.90 9.85 0.20 >50 3.50 >50 0.80 >50
17508465 115.53 11.77 4.00 28.00 3.40 >50 0.80 >50
17511877 117.92 12.27 0.20 >50 3.30 >50 0.70 >50
17510947 126.66 12.50 23.00 >50 0.70 >50 0.30 >50
22405508 131.06 12.84 120.93 13.30 2.10 >50 16.20 >50
24812833 110.79 12.87 7.90 >50 3.60 >50 1.40 >50
17510616 121.21 12.98 29.20 >50 0.80 >50 1.20 >50
14727791 94.83 18.44 0.50 >50 3.10 >50 0.30 >50
14742458 129.86 19.15 2.20 >50 2.70 >50 0.50 >50
17510946 114.68 23.26 55.59 45.50 1.40 >50 2.20 >50
24813200 112.06 24.03 21.00 >50 −0.20 >50 0.00 >50
14742370 122.00 26.04 1.20 >50 3.10 >50 0.30 >50
22400632 126.92 28.27 −1.70 >50 3.60 >50 1.10 >50
857446 127.03 28.18 1.00 >50 3.40 >50 1.20 >50
17433753 113.55 34.04 24.60 >50 4.00 >50 0.80 >50
22412622 94.24 38.24 32.90 >50 4.10 >50 2.50 >50
17516177 71.07 39.24 0.50 >50 3.60 >50 1.30 >50
17513322 121.83 40.61 15.90 >50 6.80 >50 1.70 >50
17504835 90.21 40.90 0.10 >50 0.40 >50 0.10 >50
17505825 98.90 41.24 0.10 >50 3.80 >50 1.60 >50
24825938 64.55 45.23 0.40 >50 3.60 >50 1.30 >50
14742003 62.96 48.41 1.40 >50 3.20 >50 0.70 >50

 The amount of H2O2 generated by compounds in the presence of reducing agents was expressed as the % activation of the mean maximum (100 μM H2O2, n = 32) and mean minimum (0.5% DMSO in HBSS, n = 24) plate controls calculated with an ActivityBase™ concentration–response template. The % activation at the highest compound concentration tested (50 μM) is presented together with the AC50 (50% effective concentration of activation in μM) calculated using an XLfit 4-parameter logistic (sigmoidal dose–response) model: y = (A+((B-A)/(1+((C/x)ˆD)))), where y is the percent activation and x is the corresponding compound concentration. The fitted C parameter is the AC50 and defined as the concentration giving a response half way between the fitted top (B) and bottom (A) of the curve. The A and B parameters were locked as 0 and 100, respectively. The 10-point AC50 assays were conducted in single wells per concentration, and performed in Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS) in the absence or presence of a 0.8 mM concentration of 3 different reducing agents; dithiothreitol (DTT); reduced glutathione (GSH); or TCEP: tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine. Compounds were identified by their PubChem substance identifier (SID) numbers.

 Abbreviations: DTT, Dithiothreitol; SID, PubChem Substance Identity Number.