Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 May 20.
Published in final edited form as: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010 May;19(5):440–447. doi: 10.1002/pds.1941

Table 2.

Association of type and duration of hormone therapy (HT) use with fatal breast cancer. Odds Ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95CI). Women’s CARE Study, 1994–1998

N cases/controls OR (95CI)
Never Any HT 122 / 717 1.0 ref cat
Only CHT vs never any use of HT Former, <3yr 8 / 78 .68 (.31, 1.46)
Current, <3yr 12 / 136 .67 (.35, 1.30)
Former, 3+ yr 2 / 16 1.02 (.23, 4.59)
Current, 3+ yr 24 / 250 .83 (.50, 1.38)
Any CHT vs never any use of HT* Former, <3yr 18 / 189 .72 (.42, 1.23)
Current, <3yr 19 / 166 .95 (.54, 1.66)
Former, 3+ yr 4 / 75 .47 (.17, 1.34)
Current, 3+ yr 32 / 301 .94 (.59, 1.48)
Only ET vs never any use of HT Former, <3yr 24 / 176 .90 (.55, 1.47)
Current, <3yr 15 / 122 .87 (.47, 1.60)
Former, 3+ yr 9 / 57 1.11 (.51, 2.41)
Current, 3+ yr 35 / 416 .69 (.44, 1.09)
Any ET vs never any use of HT Former, <3yr 35 / 249 .97 (.64, 1.48)
Current, <3yr 18 / 164 .82 (.46, 1.44)
Former, 3+ yr 15 / 99 1.20 (.65, 2.22)
Current, 3+ yr 42 / 510 .70 (.45, 1.07)
Any HT (CHT or ET) vs never any HT Former, <3yr 33 / 277 .79 (.52, 1.21)
Current <3yr 32 / 282 .86 (.54, 1.36)
Former 3+yr 12 / 96 .96 (.50, 1.86)
Current, 3+ yr 79 / 844 .81 (.57, 1.15)
*

Includes women who used ET before or after CHT

Includes women who used CHT before or after ET

Includes all who used CHT, ET, or both