Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov 29;589(Pt 9):2181–2196. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2010.200451

Table 1.

Summarised data of twitch, tetanus and repriming period following various treatments

Treatment set Twitch peak (%) Tetanus peak (%) RP (ms)
1. Control 100 (3) 100 (3) 4.7 ± 0.3 (3)
100 μm SNAP 98.4 ± 2.2 99.7 ± 0.9 4.3 ± 0.3
2. Control 100 (6) 100 (6) 4.6 ± 0.3 (6)
2 mm SNAP 58.5 ± 5.9* 82.4 ± 4.8* 4.2 ± 0.2
10 mm DTT 79.4 ± 10.1* 91.6 ± 3.5* (not examined)
3. Control 100 (7) 100 (6) 4.2 ± 0.2 (6)
10 mm SNAP 54.2 ± 9.2* 88.3 ± 4.3* 4.3 ± 0.2
10 mm DTT 86.9 ± 7.8 101.9 ± 3.0 4.0 ± 0.3
4. Control 100 (3) 100 (3) 4.3 ± 0.3 (3)
100 μm DTDP 69.8 ± 5.5* 95.8 ± 0.4* 4.0 ± 0.0
5 mm GSH 157.7 ± 5.8* 111.4 ± 5.6 4.0 ± 0.0
10 mm DTT 99.0 ± 2.4 91.2 ± 14.9 4.3 ± 0.3
5. Control 100 (5) 4.2 ± 0.2 (5)
10 mm H2O2 (5 min) 108.2 ± 4.6 (not examined) 4.2 ± 0.2
6. Control 100 (9) 100 (9) 4.6 ± 0.3 (5)
2 mm GSNOdel. 65.2 ± 4.7* 91.2 ± 2.1* 4.4 ± 0.3
10 mm DTT 89.7 ± 5.4 96.5 ± 4.5 4.2 ± 0.2
7. Control 100 (4) 100 (4) 4.5 ± 0.5 (4)
100 μm GSNOimm. 111.0 ± 6.9 102.3 ± 6.0 4.3 ± 0.6
8. Control 100 (20) 100 (17) 3.5 ± 0.6 (9)
2 mm GSNOimm. 81.3 ± 8.7* 84.8 ± 5.5* 3.2 ± 0.6

Data are mean ±s.e.m. values of given parameter after the indicated treatment expressed relative to initial control level prior to any treatment. Fibres given up to three different successive treatments, as indicated in the given group; number of fibres (n) shown in brackets. Twitch and tetanic force in control conditions were 27 ± 4% (n = 57) and 92 ± 2% (n = 48), respectively, of maximum Ca2+-activated force (at pCa 4.5). The repriming period (RP), a measure of the AP refractory period, was measured as the minimum interpulse interval between a pair of pulses needed to elicit >50% of maximal incremental increase in twitch size (see Fig. 3C).

*

Significant difference (P < 0.05) between value for indicated treatment relative to initial control level.

Value following DTT treatment significantly different from preceding value.