Table 3.
Distribution of tandem repeat variants at DHFR and DHPS in field isolates
| DHFR | Regions (%) | Total N (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Repeat Type | Delhi | Nadiad | Panna | Chennai | Kamrup | |
| Type 1 | 54.54 | 0 | 11.76 | 0 | 0 | 8 (11.26) |
| Type 2 | 36.34 | 100 | 76.47 | 100 | 100 | 60 (84.5) |
| Type 3 | 9.09 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (1.4) |
| Type 4 | 0 | 0 | 11.76 | 0 | 0 | 2 (2.81) |
| Total (N) | 11 | 3 | 17 | 19 | 21 | 71 |
| DHPS | ||||||
| Type A | 10 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 21.05 | 9.27 |
| Type B | 90 | 85 | 83.34 | 90 | 26.31 | 75.25 |
| Type C | 0 | 0 | 5.55 | 5 | 0 | |
| Type D | 0 | 5 | 5.55 | 0 | 15.79 | 5.15 |
| Type E | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10.52 | 2.06 |
| Type F | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10.52 | 2.06 |
| Type G | 0 | 0 | 5.55 | 0 | 10.52 | 3.09 |
| Type H | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.26 | 1.03 |
| Total (N) | 20 | 20 | 18* | 20 | 19* | 97 |
*: DNA sequences of tandem repeat region was not good in some isolates and therefore not included in analysis of tandem repeats