Skip to main content
. 2011 May 20;6(5):e19949. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019949

Table 1. QTL characteristics and candidate genes mapping to the interval.

Accession × Col Weeks V QTL Peak cM LOD A D R2x100 Candidate genes
Chr. 4 Lov-1 0 0.01 39.06 54.96 10.85 68.19 FRI
4 0.01 52.24 37.99 22.08 48.39 FRI
14 0.01 ns
Ull-2-5 8 0.01 30.52 12.49 6.86 20.8 FRI
14 0.01 ns
Var-2-6 8 0.01 24.70 7.64 7.05 34.92 FRI
Edi-0 0 0.01 31.60 23.16 7.93 73.88 FRI
4 0.01 54.01 15.56 11.62 66. 9 FRI
4 13.9 30 nd nd nd
Kno-18 0 0.01 28.51 48.44 52.76 43 FRI
RRS-10 8 0.01 11.15 8.86 4.88 14.46 FRI
Chr. 5 Lov-1 0 16.21 8.85 27.89 5.41 13.83 FLC, FY, AGL15, CO, COL1
4 12.6 31.93 37.16 12.44 33.13 FLC
14 19.21 8.87 1.81 −0.39 25.23 FLC, FY, AGL15, CO, COL1, FRL1, LHP1
Lov-1 14 82.11 5.57 −1.42 −0.29 16.92 VIN3, VIP4, TOC1, ELF5, LFY, MAF2-5
Ull-2-5 8 9.81 22.19 12.0 −2.67 18.1 TFL1, ELF6, FLC, FY, AGL15, CO, COL1, FRL1, LHP1
8 72.70 4.56 5.65 −1.61 4.2 FRL3,EMF2
14 5.81 5.92 1.52 −0.63 10.46 TFL1, ELF6, FLC, FY
Var-2-6 8 18.51 16.34 6.18 −0.62 18.57 FLC, FY, AGL15, CO, COL1
Edi-0 0 18.91 3.53 6.60 1.01 2.71 HUA2
4 18.37 4.52 2.34 2.12 3.59 FLC, FY, AGL15, CO, COL1, FRL1, LHP1, HUA2
Kno-18 0 14.4 7.51 −38.7 3.46 15.92 FLC, FY, AGL15, CO, COL1, FRL1, LHP1, HUA2
RRS-10 8 10.8 24.5 14.39 −5.9 39.26 FLC, FY, AGL15, CO, COL1, FRL1, LHP1, HUA2
Chr. 1 Lov-1 14 15.21 4.66 0.92 −0.47 13.49 SEX1
Lov-1 0 89.41 5.60 16.80 2.37 8.85 VIP5, LDL1, FT, FKF1
4 81.9 4.44 17.00 0.82 4.15 VIP5, LDL1, FT, FKF1
14 ns
Ull2-5 8 77.81 46.93 11.94 −5.06 43.17 LDL1, FT
8 21.11 4.16 3.38 −0.33 1.9 GI, SEP3
14 74.21 20.18 2.05 −0.40 24.44 SPL4, VIP5, LDL1, FT, FKF1
Ull-2-5 14 13.91 3.91 1.25 −0.87 9.08 SEX1
Var-2-6 8 74.61 14.58 7.33 0.48 20.82 SPL4, VIP5, LDL1, FT, FKF1
Edi-0 0 ns
4 82.81 6.67 7.57 −5.33 9.86 VIP5, LDL1, FT, FKF1
Kno-18 0 77.5 5.04 28.23 −17.2 12.2 VIP5, LDL1, FT, FKF1
RRS-10 8 40.9 2.54 3.79 2.15 4.53 FRL2

A: Additive effect of the QTL i.e. the contribution of one accession allele to the phenotypic variation. Values are shown with respect to the non-Col allele.

D: Dominance effect of the QTL i.e. the deviation of the heterozygote phenotype from that expected based on the additive effect. Values are shown with respect to the non-Col allele.

R2: Phenotypic variation explained by the QTL.

ns not significant.

Bold numbers are flowering time based on leaf number, rest are flowering time based on days to flowering measured when the inflorescence reached 3 cm

Shoulder on chromosome 4 QTL in Edi-0 population is associated with a high number of apparent double recombinants in the region – no clear candidate maps to this interval.