Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nutr Cancer. 2011 May;63(4):506–513. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2011.539314

Table 3.

Odds ratios (with 95% confidence intervals in parentheses) for melanoma by quintile of dietary intake of vitamin D, Emilia Romagna region, Italy

Quintile of vitamin D dietary intake (μg/day)a
Case-control matched sets I (<1.62)b II (1.62 – 2.13) III (2.13–2.72) IV (2.72–3.67) V (≥3.67) PC
All subjects 380 1.00 0.96 (0.63 – 1.45) 0.82 (0.54 – 1.26) 0.62 (0.39 – 0.98) 0.53 (0.31 – 0.88) 0.005
Men 175 1.00 0.80 (0.41 – 1.56) 0.84 (0.45 – 1.58) 0.72 (0.36 – 1.45) 0.38 (0.17 – 0.87) 0.044
Women 205 1.00 1.12 (0.64 – 1.94) 0.80 (0.44 – 1.44) 0.56 (0.30 – 1.04) 0.69 (0.34 – 1.39) 0.057
All subjects < 60 years 218 1.00 0.97 (0.54 – 1.74) 0.88 (0.48 – 1.61) 0.57 (0.29 – 1.13) 0.63 (0.32 – 1.27) 0.078
All subjects ≥ 60 years 162 1.00 0.91 (0.49 – 1.69) 0.70 (0.37 – 1.32) 0.71 (0.36 – 1.37) 0.37 (0.13 – 0.87) 0.032
Men < 60 years 86 1.00 0.83 (0.26 – 2.63) 0.96 (0.35 – 2.63) 0.92 (0.29 – 2.84) 0.76 (0.14 – 1.50) 0.216
Men ≥ 60 years 89 1.00 0.87 (0.37 – 2.05) 0.76 (0.31 – 1.85) 0.75 (0.30 – 1.93) 0.33 (0.09 – 1.16) 0.148
Women < 60 years 132 1.00 1.03 (0.50 – 2.13) 0.84 (0.38 – 1.84) 0.46 (0.19 – 1.09) 0.76 (0.30 – 1.88) 0.169
Women ≥ 60 years 73 1.00 1.09 (0.41 – 2.93) 0.53 (0.20 – 1.43) 0.69 (0.25 – 1.85) 0.33 (0.08 – 1.40) 0.110
a

Based on dietary vitamin D intake distribution in controls

b

Referent category

c

P for trend using quintiles of vitamin D intake in a conditional logistic regression model adjusting for energy and calcium intake, phototype, history of sunburns, skin sun reaction and education