Skip to main content
. 2011 Jun 1;34(6):695–709. doi: 10.5665/SLEEP.1030

Table 5.

Sensitivity analysis: Incremental cost effectiveness ratios compared to the next best diagnostic strategy under various scenarios

Scenario No Diagnosis & No Treatment* Split-Night PSG Full-Night PSG Unattended Portable Home Monitoring Empiric Treatment
    Base case Dominated 17,131 Dominated Dominated
        Test Characteristics
            Best case, FN Dominated 17,095 Dominated Dominated
            Worst case, FN 19,876 Dominated 516,167 2,333,995
            Best case, both FN & SN 16,777 Dominated Dominated Dominated
            Worst case, both FN & SN Dominated 20,448 48,206 2,333,995
            Best case UPHM Dominated 17,131 Dominated Dominated
            Worst case UPHM Dominated 17,131 Dominated Dominated
            No patient refuses FN-PSG after technical failure with UPHM Dominated 17,131 782,167 Dominated
            No technical failure from UPHM Dominated 17,131 Dominated Dominated
        OSA related risks
            Decreased impact of OSA on MVC risks Dominated 18,036 Dominated Dominated
            Increased impact of OSA on MVC risks Dominated 16,281 Dominated Dominated
            Decreased impact of OSA on hypertension risks Dominated 17,974 Dominated Dominated
            Increased impact of OSA on hypertension risks Dominated 16,551 Dominated Dominated
            Decreased impact of OSA on MI &stroke risk Dominated 23,554 Dominated Dominated
            Increased impact of OSA on MI & stroke risk Dominated 14,821 Dominated Dominated
        Efficacy of therapy
            Only MVC benefit Dominated 25,986 Dominated Dominated
            Only CV benefit Dominated 20,362 Dominated Dominated
            75% of MVC and CV benefit Dominated 19,448 Dominated Dominated
            50% of MVC and CV benefit Dominated 22,582 Dominated Dominated
            25% of MVC and CV benefit Dominated 26,827 Dominated Dominated
            0% of MVC and CV benefit (only benefit is the utility gain from reduced day-time sleepiness) Dominated 32,675 Dominated Dominated
        Compliance with Therapy
            Perfect compliance Dominated 16,696 Dominated Dominated
            Low compliance: Double the number of patients who never try therapy, & double the quit rate Dominated 17,726 Dominated Dominated
            False Positives self-identify by quitting CPAP therapy at 12 times the rate of True Positives 17,074 51,557 Dominated 817,009
        Cost
            Low FN-PSG cost Dominated 17,031 Dominated Dominated
            High FN-PSG cost Dominated 17,330 Dominated Dominated
            Low SN-PSG cost Dominated 17,131 Dominated Dominated
            Low UPHM cost Dominated 17,131 Dominated Dominated
            Low CPAP treatment cost Dominated 9,856 Dominated Dominated
            High CPAP treatment cost Dominated 42,593 Dominated Dominated
            Low cost of MVC Dominated 18,492 Dominated Dominated
            High cost of MVC Dominated 14,409 Dominated Dominated
            Low cost of CV chronic care Dominated 18,243 Dominated Dominated
            High cost of CV chronic care Dominated 13,947 Dominated Dominated
        Utilities
            Annualized equivalent of 2 days lost for attending sleep clinic for FN-PSG or SN-PSG Dominated 17,304 Dominated Dominated
            No utility gain from reduction in day-time sleepiness (only benefit is the utility gain from reduced MVC and CV risks) Dominated 37,974 Dominated Dominated
            Large utility gain associated with treated OSA; same as no OSA with CPAP (2% reduction from age-specific HR-QoL) Dominated 13,325 Dominated Dominated
*

“No Diagnosis & No Treatment” was the least costly strategy in all scenarios tested. It is the comparator for the next strategy on the efficient frontier.

Dominated & Strategies that are not on the efficient frontier are described as dominated. Dominated strategies cost more and provide fewer QALYs than another strategy or a combination of strategies available to the decision-maker.