Table 3.
A. Eye-in-head vs. head (KV) and head-fixed eye (Kfx) | B. Eye-in-head vs. head (Kv) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Condition | Subject | Slope (Kv) | Slope (Kfx) | Delay (ms) | R2 | Slope (KV) | R2 |
IE | 1 | −0.702 | 0.635 | 25 | 0.997 | −0.534 | 0.960 |
2 | −0.945 | 1.243 | 20 | 0.998 | −0.610 | 0.967 | |
3 | −1.035 | 1.068 | 5 | 0.985 | −0.576 | 0.893 | |
4 | −0.672 | 0.476 | 10 | 0.982 | −0.557 | 0.932 | |
5 | −1.029 | 1.109 | 5 | 0.991 | −0.557 | 0.970 | |
6 | −0.775 | 1.381 | 15 | 0.952 | −0.592 | 0.909 | |
SRE | 1 | −0.614 | 0.719 | 25 | 0.984 | −0.556 | 0.628 |
2 | −1.004 | 1.186 | 5 | 0.997 | −0.684 | 0.851 | |
3 | −0.753 | 1.098 | 20 | 0.935 | −0.501 | 0.516 | |
4 | −0.887 | 1.266 | 15 | 0.955 | −0.436 | 0.530 | |
5 | −0.802 | 1.185 | 5 | 0.991 | −0.598 | 0.611 | |
6 | −0.702 | 0.585 | 25 | 0.935 | −0.699 | 0.800 | |
MRE | 1 | −0.618 | 0.666 | 5 | 0.979 | −0.503 | 0.813 |
2 | −1.074 | 1.195 | 15 | 0.994 | −0.606 | 0.858 | |
3 | −1.045 | 1.508 | 15 | 0.905 | −0.293 | 0.142 | |
4 | −1.186 | 1.378 | 25 | 0.965 | −0.508 | 0.582 | |
5 | −0.793 | 1.106 | 15 | 0.959 | −0.555 | 0.523 | |
6 | −0.625 | 0.507 | 5 | 0.900 | −0.587 | 0.676 | |
IE | Average | −0.860 | 0.985 | 15 | 0.984 | −0.571 | 0.938 |
SRE | Average | −0.794 | 1.006 | 15 | 0.966 | −0.579 | 0.656 |
MRE | Average | −0.890 | 1.060 | 15 | 0.950 | −0.509 | 0.599 |
The analysis shows that there is a much better fit to the data when a component proportional to head-fixed eye velocity is included (cf. R2 values in columns 6 and 8). Optimum delays are also given (column 5). Data for 10 and 20 deg s−1 stimuli were combined in each subject.