Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 May 23.
Published in final edited form as: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21;(1):CD007587. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007587
Methods Blinding: none
Dropouts/withdrawals: unclear
Observation period: baseline 2 months; treatment unclear, no follow-up
Acupuncturists’ assessments: GA differently/60% - BB differently/30%
Participants Number of patients included/analyzed: 22?/22
Condition: myogenic headache
Demographics: mean age 46 years (acupuncture) and 37 (control); 82% female
Setting: neurological outpatient department of university hospital in Finland
Time since onset of headaches: 5.7 years
Interventions Acupuncture points: GB8, GB20, BL10, BL12, BL15, Chuanxi and pressure points on the neck
No information on acupuncturist(s)
DeChi achieved?: no information
Number of treatment sessions: unclear (10 minutes each)
Frequency of treatment sessions: no information
Control intervention: physiotherapy (parafango, massage, ultrasound)
Outcomes Method for outcome measurement: point measurement (no diaries); pain intensity (visual analogue scale) and muscle tension (EMG) were measured; only data for follow-up and only number of patients with global response, response regarding frequency and medication presented
Notes Insufficient reporting; unclear whether there were dropouts/withdrawals, poor outcome measurement; sample size too small to assess equivalence of the two therapies
Risk of bias
Item Authors’ judgement Description
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear No description
Allocation concealment? Unclear No description
Blinding? All outcomes No No
Incomplete outcome data addressed? All outcomes Unclear No mentioning of attrition
Free of selective reporting? No Visual analogue scales have been used but only global responder measures are re-ported
Incomplete follow-up outcome data ad-dressed? Unclear No mentioning of attrition