Skip to main content
. 2011 Apr 19;11:247. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-247

Table 3.

PAR of risk factors including UAI by sexual position

Risk factor PAR (95% CI)
Crude model
PAR (95% CI)
Adjusted model
Average annual
number of HIV cases
Average lifetime HIV costs
(range)(1) AUD$million, 2010 dollars
1% discounting 3% discounting 5% discounting

All risk factors 0.94 (0.82,0.98) 658 448 (416-487) 283 (257-314) 186 (165-212)

UAI by sexual position(2) 0.78 (0.69,0.89) 0.73 (0.66,0.85) 511 348 (323-378) 220 (200-244) 144 (128-165)

Insertive UAI only (strategic positioning) 0.12 (0.07,0.19) 0.04 (0.02,0.10) 28 19 (18-21) 12 (11-13) 8 (7-9)

Receptive UAI 0.66 (0.54,0.76) 0.69 (0.58,0.78) 483 329 (305-357) 208 (189-231) 136 (121-156)

Receptive with withdrawal 0.21 (0.16,0.28) 0.28 (0.20,0.37) 196 134 (124-145) 84 (77-94) 55 (49-63)

Receptive with ejaculation 0.45 (0.35,0.55) 0.41 (0.32,0.51) 287 196 (182-212) 123 (112-137) 81 (72-92)

Circumcision status(3)

Uncircumcision 0.08 (0.04,0.16) 0.07 (0.03,0.15) 49 33 (31-36) 21 (19-23) 14 (12-16)

Number of sexual partners

10+ casual sexual partners in the last 6 m 0.26 (0.18,0.36) 0.25 (0.14,0.42) 175 119 (111-129) 75 (68-84) 49 (44-56)

STIs(4)

Anal warts between study visits 0.14 (0.10,0.18) 0.12 (0.08,0.18) 84 57 (53-62) 36 (33-40) 24 (21-27)

Anal gonorrhoea at study visit 0.06 (0.04,0.07) 0.02 (0.01,0.03) 14 10 (9-10) 6 (5-7) 4 (4-5)

CI = Confidence interval, PAR = population attributable risk, UAI = Unprotected anal intercourse, m = months

1. The average healthcare costs incurred from HIV seroconversions associated with specific risk factors were calculated by multiplying the PAR percent for each specific risk factor, by the 700 HIV infections associated with male homosexual exposure, by the average healthcare costs per HIV-infected person. We performed sensitivity analyses by rate of discounting and according to the bounds in delays in durations of time between infection and diagnoses and commencement of antiretroviral treatment but calculations were based on the best estimated PAR of the risk factors and not the 95% CI of the PAR.

2. Adapted from Jin et al [8]

3. Adapted from Templeton et al [9]

4. Adapted from Jin et al [21]