Skip to main content
. 2011 May;32(2):61–67.

Table.

Comparison of the performance of the MDRD and various cystatin C-based formulae for estimating GFR of more than 60 mL/min, adapted from the study by Chudleigh et al. with permission.13 In this study of 100 subjects with diabetes, the mean reference isotopic GFR measurement ± SD was 104.5 ± 20 mL/min/1.73m2. A full description of the formulae used in the study is contained in the above reference.13 Bias is the mean difference between a reference isotopic GFR and GFR estimated by the various formulae. Precision is the standard deviation of the bias. Accuracy refers to the proportion of results that fall within 10% or 30% of reference isotopic GFR measurements.

Reference-isotopic GFR 105 mL/min/1.73m2
Formula eGFR Bias Precision Accuracy, %
10% 30%
MDRD 77.4 −27.1 18.0 10 65
Perkins 124.5 20.0 29.5 21 64
Arnal 101.7 −2.8 32.2 30 75
Rule 90.0 −14.5 28.4 31 68
MacIsaac 102.1 −2.4 26.0 34 85
Tan 101.6 −2.9 26.6 34 84
Stevens * 96.0 −8.5 28.1 29 75
Stevens 85.6 −18.9 19.0 27 78
*

Formula incorporates cystatin C, age and gender.

Formula incorporates cystatin C, age and gender plus creatinine levels.