Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Aggress Behav. 2011 Apr 1;37(4):362–373. doi: 10.1002/ab.20391

Table 3.

Results of Logistic Regression to Predict Having a New Partner at T2 from T1 Variables (N = 440)

Predictor variable at T1 OR 95% CI
Intimate partner relationship length (months) 0.98 [0.95, 1.00]
HED 1.42* [1.07, 1.90]
Frequency of marijuana use 0.92 [0.73, 1.16]
Partner’s HED 0.95 [0.73, 1.24]
Partner’s frequency of marijuana use 0.94 [0.78, 1.14]
Partner antisocial behavior 1.06 [0.98, 1.15]
Relationship satisfaction 0.94*** [0.91, 0.96]
Frequency of psychological aggression
(combined perpetration/ victimization
1.00 [0.98, 1.02]
Female-only perpetration of IPVa 1.41 [0.69, 2.88]
Mutual IPVa 0.62 [0.25, 1.52]

Note: OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval; T1 = first fall semester in college; T2 = first spring semester in college; HED = heavy episodic drinking; IPV = intimate partner violence. χ2(10) = 61.55, p < .001.

a

Reference group is No IPV.

*

p < .05

***

p < .001.