Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Aggress Behav. 2011 May 4;37(4):349–361. doi: 10.1002/ab.20397

Table 5.

Percent of Total Variance of Each Construct (“Dependent Constructs”) Explained by Other Constructs (“Independent Constructs”). (N=838).

Independent Constructs Dependent Constructs % of Total
Explained Variance
Components of Externalizing Behaviors (T1)1 Peer Delinquency (T2) 22%
Peer Delinquency (T2) Illegal Drug Use (T2) 46%
Components of Externalizing Behaviors (T1), and Peer Delinquency (T2) Components of Externalizing
Behaviors (T3)
36%
Illegal Drug Use (T2), and Externalizing Behaviors (T3) Violent Behavior (T3) 33%
Components of Externalizing Behaviors (T3) Perceived Neighborhood (T4) 4%
Illegal Drug Use (T2), Violent Behavior (T3), Components of Externalizing
Behaviors (T3), and Perceived Neighborhood Crime (T4)
Violent Behavior (T4) 20%
1

- e.g., Components of Externalizing Behaviors explained 22% of the variance of peer delinquency.

Notes:

1. Independent constructs are those constructs with arrows pointed toward the dependent construct (see Figure 1)

2. Ethnicity and gender were statistically controlled

3. T1 = Time 1, X̄ age = 14.0; T2 = Time 2, X̄ age = 19.1; T3 = Time 3, X̄ age = 24.4; T4 = Time 4, X̄ age = 29.2.