Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Laryngoscope. 2011 May 6;121(6):1320–1326. doi: 10.1002/lary.21749

Table I.

DISE findings according to previous surgical treatment.

All previous palate surgery (n=33) Palate surgery alone (n=17) Palate surgery and genioglossus advancement** (n=7) Palate surgery and tongue radiofrequency** (n=9) Palate surgery and hyoid suspension*** (n=6) P values for chi- squared tests of palate surgery alone vs. tongue region surgery and for genioglossus advancement vs. tongue radiofrequency
Analysis I. Global assessment of level(s) of obstruction
Palate 17 (53%) 7 (44%) 4 (57%) 6 (67%) 6 (100%) 0.36, 0.37
Hypopharynx 32 (97%) 17 (100%) 7 (100%) 8 (89%) 6 (100%) 0.50, 1.00
Analysis II. Degree of obstruction
Palate
<50% 16 (48%) 10 (59%) 3 (43%) 3 (33%) 0 (0%) 0.63, 0.63
50–75% 2 (6%) 1 (6%) 0 (0%) 1 (11%) 1 (17%)
>75% 15 (45%) 6 (35%) 4 (57%) 5 (56%) 5 (83%)
Hypopharynx
<50% 1 (3%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (11%) 0 (0%) 1.00, 0.55
50–75% 6 (18%) 4 (24%) 2 (29%) 0 (0%) 2 (33%)
>75% 26 (79%) 13 (76%) 5 (71%) 8 (78%) 4 (67%)
Analysis III. Specific structures.
Primary structure contributing to obstruction at level of the palate
None 16 (48%) 10 (59%) 3 (43%) 3 (33%) 0 (0%) 0.36, 0.37
Velum 17 (52%) 7 (41%) 4 (57%) 6 (67%) 6 (100%)
Tonsils n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Primary structure contributing to obstruction at the level of the hypopharynx
None 1 (3%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (11%) 0 (0%) 0.84, 0.60
Oropharyngeal lateral walls 10 (30%) 5 (29%) 3 (43%) 2 (22%) 4 (67%)
Tongue 21 (64%) 11 (65%) 4 (57%) 6 (67%) 2 (33%)
Epiglottis 1 (3%) 1 (6%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
Specific structures contributing to obstruction*
Velum 17 (53%) 7 (44%) 4 (57%) 6 (67%) 6 (100%) 0.48, 1.00
Oropharyngeal lateral walls 17 (53%) 8 (50%) 4 (57%) 5 (56%) 6 (100%) 0.72, 1.00
Tongue 29 (88%) 15 (88%) 6 (86%) 8 (89%) 4 (67%) 1.00, 1.00
Epiglottis 8 (25%) 6 (38%) 1 (14%) 1 (11%) 0 (0%) 0.22, 1.00

Note: Table reports raw results, followed by column percents.

*

Each structure is considered separately, with percentages expressed as a fraction of total DISE evaluations. Percentages sum to greater than 100% because it was possible for a patient to have more than one structure contributing to airway obstruction.

**

Includes subjects that also had undergone hyoid suspension.

***

Includes subjects that also had undergone genioglossus advancement or tongue radiofrequency.