Skip to main content
. 2011 Mar 23;96(6):1805–1814. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-3055

Table 4.

Relationship between CRP and mortality within waist circumference categories in whites (n = 16,434)

n = dead Absolute risk (%) HRa 95% CI P value
Q1 WC CRP <1 (n = 2005) 58 2.9 1
Q1 WC CRP 1–3 (n = 1350) 70 5.2 1.59 1.10 2.29 0.01
Q1 WC CRP ≥3 (n = 878) 84 9.6 2.60 1.81 3.71 <0.0001
212/4233 = 5.0%
Q2 WC CRP <1 (n = 1189) 43 3.6 1
Q2 WC CRP 1–3 (n = 1284) 53 4.1 1.07 0.66 1.53 0.98
Q2 WC CRP ≥3 (n = 985) 72 7.3 1.65 1.10 2.48 0.01
168/3458 = 4.9%
Q3 WC CRP <1 (n = 1070) 36 3.4 1
Q3 WC CRP 1–3 (n = 1595) 78 4.9 1.53 1.02 2.31 0.042
Q3 WC CRP ≥3 (n = 1570) 108 6.9 2.20 1.47 3.27 0.0001
222/4235 = 5.2%
Q4 WC CRP <1 (n = 679) 37 5.5 1
Q4 WC CRP 1–3 (n = 1547) 95 6.1 1.26 0.84 1.88 0.26
Q4 WC CRP ≥3 (n = 2282) 192 8.4 1.90 1.31 2.76 0.0008
324/4458 = 7.3%

CRP concentration is in milligrams per liter. Q, Quartile; WC, waist circumference.

a

Adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, alcohol use, and physical activity.