Skip to main content
. 2011 May 4;17:1153–1163.

Table 3. XPD and XRCC1 combined genotype comparison of controls and patients.

XPD/ XRCC Male+Female Controls (n=193) Male+Female POAG (n=160) p (χ2) p (z) Male+Female PCAG (n=163) p (χ2) p (z)
AA/GG
48(25%)
25(15%)
0.01 (20.44)
<0.05(2.14)
31(19%)
>0.05 (7.18)
>0.05(1.32)
AA/GA
30(16%)
19(12%)

>0.05(0.99)
18(11%)

>0.05(1.24)
AA/AA
14(7%)
8(5%)

>0.05(0.87)
9(5%)

>0.05(0.66)
AC/GG
40(21%)
29(18%)

>0.05(0.61)
35(21%)

>0.05(1.72)
AC/GA
26(13%)
45(28%)

<0.001(3.42)
26(16%)

>0.05(0.66)
AC/AA
10(5%)
3(2%)

>0.05(1.64)
14(9%)

>0.05(1.28)
CC/GG
10(5%)
16(10%)

>0.05(1.73)
13(8%)

>0.05(1.07)
CC/GA
9(4%)
9(6%)

>0.05(0.41)
12(7%)

>0.05(1.08)
CC/AA
6(3%)
6(4%)

>0.05(0.33)
5(3%)

>0.05(0.02)
XPD/ XRCC
Male Controls (n=101)
Male POAG (n=80)
p (χ2)
p (z)
Male PCAG (n=81)
p (χ2)
p (z)
AA/GG
36(35%)
12(15%)
<0.001 (27.04)
<0.001(3.12)
17(21%)
>0.05 (9.60)
<0.05(2.16)
AA/GA
11(11%)
12(15%)

>0.05(0.82)
11(14%)

>0.05(0.55)
AA/AA
9(9%)
3(4%)

>0.05(1.39)
5(6%)

>0.05(0.69)
AC/GG
20(20%)
9(11%)

>0.05(1.56)
17(21%)

>0.05(0.20)
AC/GA
14(14%)
26(33%)

<0.001(3.00)
12(15%)

>0.05(0.18)
AC/AA
4(4%)
1(1%)

>0.05(1.10)
8(10%)

>0.05(1.60)
CC/GG
2(2%)
6(7%)

>0.05(1.79)
4(5%)

>0.05(1.11)
CC/GA
3(3%)
5(6%)

>0.05(1.07)
6(7%)

>0.05(1.37)
CC/AA
2(2%)
6(7%)

>0.05(1.79)
1(1%)

>0.05(0.39)
XPD/ XRCC
Female Controls (n=92)
Female POAG (n=80)
p (χ2)
p (z)
Female PCAG (n=82)
p (χ2)
p (z)
AA/GG
12(13%)
13(16%)
>0.05 (13.01)
>0.05(0.60)
14(17%)
>0.05 (5.57)
>0.05(0.74)
AA/GA
19(21%)
7(9%)

<0.05(2.17)
7(8%)

<0.05(2.24)
AA/AA
5(5%)
5(6%)

>0.05(0.23)
4(5%)

>0.05(0.17)
AC/GG
20(22%)
20(25%)

>0.05(0.50)
18(22%)

>0.05(0.03)
AC/GA
12(13%)
19(24%)

>0.05(1.82)
14(17%)

>0.05(0.74)
AC/AA
6(6%)
2(3%)

>0.05(1.25)
6(7%)

>0.05(0.21)
CC/GG
8(9%)
10(12%)

>0.05(0.81)
9(11%)

>0.05(0.51)
CC/GA
6(6%)
4(5%)

>0.05(0.43)
6(7%)

>0.05(0.21)
CC/AA 4(4%) 0(0%) >0.05(1.89) 4(5%) >0.05(0.17)

Significant p values (<0.05) are in bold italics.