Skip to main content
. 2011 Apr 17;211(3):405–413. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2677-0

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Sagittal and axial view of differential error- and context-related brain activations. Increased activation in mPFC (−10, 46, 42) was evident for errors made in the context which implied consequences for others (duo) compared with errors committed in the condition that affected only the agents themselves (solo). Thresholded at T = 3.36, corrected for multiple comparisons at the cluster level