A. |
Mathematical subtraction |
Estimate EPI from modelling and subtract from measurement data |
[1, 2, 4, 7, 8, 11] |
B. |
Electrode distance variation |
Eliminate homogenous sample contribution by measuring with different distances between the electrodes |
[2, 12] |
C. |
Substitution method |
Sample is substituted with a calibration solution with known properties to estimate the EPI |
[2, 3, 9, 11] |
D. |
4-electrode |
Separate electrode pairs for excitation and pick-up eliminate current in the pick-up electrodes and the EPI is not included in the measurement. |
[15, 16] |
E. |
Increased current density |
Current density above the linear region may reduce the EPI significantly |
[2, p 282, 12] |
F. |
Electrode modification |
Modification of electrode properties for enhanced quality and less EPI |
[1, 2, 7, 11] |
G. |
Reduction of sample conductivity |
EPI is less pronounced in low conductive media measurements |
[2] |
H. |
Electrode-less excitation by magnetic induction |
The electrodes and their parasitic properties can be avoided by using a coil and magnetic induction for excitation and measurement. |
[11, 17] |
I. |
Coupling fluid |
The electrodes can be moved out of the current field or be enlarged by using a conductive coupling fluid to establish contact to the sample |
[5] |