Skip to main content
. 2011 Apr 8;286(22):19982–19992. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.240077

TABLE 1.

SND1 global regulation of metastatic and oncogenic signaling programs

GSEA of control versus SND1-KD microarray analysis indicated 55 gene sets significantly down-regulated in the SND1-KD condition (p < 0.01 and false discovery rate (FDR) <0.25). Significantly down-regulated gene sets pertinent to metastasis and/or oncogenic signaling (n = 17) are shown. Gene sets tested for enrichment were obtained from the C2 collection provided in the Molecular Signatures Database v3.0 of the Broad Institute GSEA server. Nom, nominal; NES, normalized enrichment score; DMOG, dimethyloxalyl glycine.

Gene set Size NES Nom p value FDR q value
Minn lung metastasis up-regulated genes 43 2.25 <0.001 0.006
Amit EGF response 40 HeLa 38 2.14 <0.001 0.015
Amit serum response 40 MCF10A 28 2.13 <0.001 0.013
Bild HRas oncogenic signature 220 1.97 <0.001 0.076
Amit EGF response 120 MCF10A 39 1.83 <0.001 0.117
Nagashima EGF signature up 52 1.82 <0.001 0.116
Elvidge hypoxia by DMOG up 114 1.77 <0.001 0.156
Tomlins prostate cancer up 34 1.77 <0.001 0.151
Mense hypoxia up 80 1.77 <0.001 0.149
Elvidge hypoxia up 147 1.72 <0.001 0.162
Farmer breast cancer cluster 7 19 1.72 0.005 0.160
Wang Barrett esophagus cancer up 25 1.70 0.005 0.179
Winter hypoxia metagene 215 1.67 <0.001 0.191
Croonquist NRas vs. stromal stimulation up 33 1.64 0.006 0.211
Rickman head and neck cancer 78 1.64 0.003 0.213
Winter hypoxia up 81 1.61 <0.001 0.235
Wu cell migration 166 1.59 <0.001 0.244