Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 May 27.
Published in final edited form as: J Rural Health. 2008 Fall;24(4):390–399. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2008.00186.x

Table 5.

Proportion of CRC Patients Bypassing Closest Cancer Care Providers by Geographic Area of Residence

Surgical Hospitals (Stages I–III CRC Patients) MOs (Stage III Colon Cancer,
Stage II–III Rectal Cancer Patients)
ROs (Stage II–III Rectal Cancer Patients)



Rural Rural Rural



% Bypassing
by More than:
Isolated Small
(N = 1,467)
Small
(N = 1,526)
Large
(N = 1,618)
Urban
(N = 21,863)
Isolated Small
(N = 294)
Small
(N = 324)
Large
(N = 307)
Urban
(N = 4,493)
Isolated Small
(N = 63)
Small
(N = 73)
Large
(N = 65)
Urban
(N = 901)
30 miles 27.1*** 28.5 14.9 1.9 19.4*** 21.0 26.1 2.7 25.4*** 26.0 21.5 2.3
50 miles 17.9*** 20.6 11.1 1.0 11.6*** 10.5 18.6 0.7 17.5*** 13.7 10.8 1.4

Overall chi-square tests were used to test for statistically significant differences between patients living in the 4 different geographic areas (e.g., comparing proportions of stage I–III CRC patients living in urban, large rural, small rural, and isolated small rural areas who bypassed their closest cancer care providers by more than 30 miles).

*

P ≤ .05.

**

P ≤ .01.

***

P ≤ .001.