Table 3.

Performance of the statistics T_RMLa and T_AMLa with 15 dichotomized indicators, based on converged replications (df = p_* − q = 87, RN=reject number, RR=reject ratio).

n	Method	TMLa		TRMLa				TAMLa
		Mean	SD	Mean	SD	RN	RR	Mean	SD	RN	RR
100	ML	497.31	162.63	87.59	32.53	92	21.0%	32.15	13.63	52	11.9%
	ML.1	468.81	140.42	137.47	39.73	363	73.9%	56.23	15.99	284	57.8%
	ML.2	290.74	80.33	121.35	32.71	572	59.5%	51.20	13.47	375	39.0%
200	ML	708.30	228.50	133.40	41.16	474	68.9%	71.03	21.73	388	56.4%
	ML.1	371.14	89.05	109.59	25.27	441	44.3%	62.57	13.85	308	31.0%
	ML.2	236.76	43.25	99.24	17.78	248	24.8%	58.64	10.07	130	13.0%
300	ML	619.56	189.86	116.80	33.29	505	51.1%	71.41	19.72	410	41.5%
	ML.1	335.20	62.25	99.71	18.34	262	26.2%	65.79	11.75	177	17.7%
	ML.2	225.60	37.47	94.77	15.77	156	15.6%	64.52	10.34	95	9.5%
400	ML	549.61	126.47	105.00	23.18	365	36.5%	69.97	15.07	274	27.4%
	ML.1	320.01	55.37	95.55	16.45	189	18.9%	68.30	11.44	123	12.3%
	ML.2	219.34	35.16	92.24	14.85	114	11.4%	67.96	10.62	70	7.0%