Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Dec 8.
Published in final edited form as: Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2011 Feb;64(0 1):10.1348/000711010X497442. doi: 10.1348/000711010X497442

Table 8.

Performance of the statistics TRMLa and TAMLa with 6 five-category and 9 dichotomous indicators, based on converged replications (df = p*q = 87, RN=reject number, RR=reject ratio).

n Method TMLa
TRMLa
TAMLa
Mean SD Mean SD RN RR Mean SD RN RR
100 ML 504.19 164.86 123.43 43.13 165 56.1% 42.64 16.72 124 42.2%
ML.1 313.13 94.08 126.18 37.42 565 64.1% 48.27 14.05 378 42.9%
ML.2 183.64 38.05 106.38 21.63 383 38.4% 42.57 8.43 180 18.1%

200 ML 487.36 169.66 123.47 41.20 522 55.7% 59.69 19.78 404 43.1%
ML.1 249.16 49.10 101.26 19.62 304 30.4% 53.88 10.19 177 17.7%
ML.2 164.26 27.54 95.18 15.92 190 19.0% 52.92 8.57 87 8.7%

300 ML 413.77 110.85 106.31 27.42 365 36.6% 59.24 15.15 254 25.5%
ML.1 234.68 43.58 95.79 17.73 190 19.0% 58.58 10.61 114 11.4%
ML.2 159.44 27.02 92.41 15.71 129 12.9% 58.98 9.71 75 7.5%

400 ML 383.55 81.45 99.43 20.54 270 27.0% 60.00 12.31 174 17.4%
ML.1 227.84 39.06 93.19 16.00 144 14.4% 61.52 10.35 88 8.8%
ML.2 156.81 25.18 90.89 14.68 107 10.7% 62.60 9.84 66 6.6%