Table 6.

Simulation results. Data generated under three-class model with non-zero mean for latent variable in each class

Class 1
Parameter	True Value	Mean (SD)	Average Bias	Coverage
Pr(Ci = k)	0.50	0.49 (0.06)	−0.009	92
α1	7.0	6.97 (0.11)	−0.031	95
α2	6.5	6.51 (0.19)	0.013	95
λ1	0.8	0.81 (0.12)	0.010	96
λ2	0.9	0.88 (0.09)	−0.020	93
γ1	−0.10	−0.099 (0.013)	0.0009	97
γ2	0.002	0.002 (0.0004)	−0.000038	97
Class 2
Parameter	True Value	Mean (SD)	Average Bias	Coverage
Pr(Ci = k)	0.33	0.33 (0.029)	0.001	96
α1	6.0	6.02 (0.15)	0.021	92
α2	6.0	6.00 (0.15)	0.004	96
λ1	1.2	1.21 (0.05)	0.0077	97
λ2	1.2	1.21 (0.05)	0.0057	96
γ1	−0.25	−0.25 (0.016)	0.0029	95
γ2	0.0034	0.0033 (0.00047)	−0.00007	98
Class 3
Parameter	True Value	Mean (SD)	Average Bias	Coverage
Pr(Ci = k)	0.17	0.17 (0.055)	0.0056	96
α1	6.5	6.47 (0.25)	−0.035	96
α2	7.5	7.47 (0.17)	−0.028	94
λ1	1.60	1.59 (0.16)	−0.012	88
λ2	0.30	0.31 (0.095)	0.011	94
γ1	−0.15	−0.15 (0.021)	0.0046	95
γ2	0.0032	0.0031 (0.0006)	−0.00014	96
Variance Parameters
Parameter	True Value	Mean (SD)	Average Bias	Coverage
Ψa	0.20	0.21 (0.047)	0.014	98
${\tau }_1^2$	0.20	0.21 (0.041)	0.011	97
${\tau }_2^2$	0.20	0.21 (0.038)	0.008	96
${\sigma }_1^2$	0.30	0.30 (0.034)	0.0016	97
${\sigma }_2^2$	0.30	0.30 (0.029)	0.0017	96