Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 May 31.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS Behav. 2007 Nov 3;13(1):10–22. doi: 10.1007/s10461-007-9318-4

Table 3.

Bivariate correlations among latent variables and fit statistics for tested models

ADH SE OE DEP SOC SPR STG DFL COM
SE .632***
OE .077 .202*
DEP −.283*** −.244** −.128
SOC .156* .266*** .136 −.456***
SPR .001 .093 .234** −.215** .412***
STG −.220** −.233** −.003 .084 −.134 −.082
DFL −.224* −.195 −.145 .321** −.079 .040 .118
COM .140 .229** .380*** −.165* .338*** .314*** −.091 −.031
DM −.034 .148* .295*** .012 .052 .206** −.150* .108 .254***
Model & fit statistics
Model Pathsa Included χ2 (df) P-value χ2/df GFI AGFI NFI NNFI RMSEA
Full a–r 921.87 (750) .00002 1.229 .839 .816 .876 .964 .031
A a–g, i–k, o–r 923.09 (754) .00002 1.224 .839 .816 .876 .965 .030
B a, b, d, f, i–k, r, sb 573.59 (479) .0019 1.197 .871 .849 .894 .973 .029
C a, b, d, f, i, j, s 423.03 (363) .0161 1.165 .890 .868 .911 .983 .027
Reduced a, b, d, i, j, s 322.95 (265) .0085 1.219 .901 .879 .928 .984 .031
a

See Fig. 1 for path

b

Model modified by adding a path from Communication Satisfaction to SE (noted as path s)

Note: ADH = Adherence, SE = Self Efficacy, OE = Outcome Expectancy, DEP = Depression, SOC = Social Support, SPR = Spirituality, STG = Stigma, DFL = Difficult Life Circumstances, COM = Communication Satisfaction, DM = Decision-making

*

P < .05,

**

P < .01,

***

P < .001