Skip to main content
. 2011 May 31;8(5):e1000437. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000437

Table 5. Adequacy of AL doses obtained and consumed (mean of cluster summaries from nine intervention and nine control clusters).

Adequacy Controla (N = 9), % (SD) Interventionb (N = 9), % (SD) Difference in Means (95% CI) p-Valuec, Unadjusted; Adjusted
Adequacy of dose obtained from the provider:
Baseline 69.9 (33.8) 68.6 (35.9)
Follow-up 71.6 (20.9) 76.9 (7.2) 5.3 (20.9, −10.3) 0.4836; 0.6545
Adequacy of dose administered:
Baseline 40.5 (23.3) 53.1 (40.2)
Follow-up 49.4 (24.8) 67.0 (8.5) 17.6 (36.1, −0.9) 0.0606; 0.1095
a

Total number of doses in the control arm: Baseline = 26; Follow-up = 89.

b

Total number of doses in the intervention arm: Baseline = 30; Follow-up = 221.

c

p-Value: The p-value appearing first refers to the level of significance of the unadjusted difference between control and intervention arms at follow-up. The p value in italics refers to the level of significance of the adjusted difference between the control and intervention arm at follow-up.

N, number of clusters.