Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Mar 25;127(6):1344–1350. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.02.027

Table1.

Advantages and limitations of novel approaches to gene therapy

Technology Basic concept Major advantages Major limitations Technical aspects that
need to be improved prior
to clinical implementation
Homing
Endonucleases
(HEs)
Use of highly specific engineered
endonuclease to induce a DSB in
a desired locus and promote
homologous recombination with
a repair matrix.
Gene correction within the
endogenous locus, thus
maintaining proper regulation
of gene expression.
The low number of HEs available
limit applicability of this strategy
for gene correction.
Lack of animal models for pre-
clinical trials.
Low efficiency
Off-target cleavage
Inefficient intranuclear
delivery of HE and repair
matrix.
Zinc Finger
Nucleases
(ZFNs)
Use of an artificial fusion protein
that combines a nuclease with a
Zinc-finger protein to induce site-
specific DSBs and promote
homologous recombination with
a repair matrix.
Gene correction within the
natural locus allows for
maintenance of endogenous
regulation
Need for a specific system for each
gene and sometimes for different
mutations with in the same gene.
Lack of animal models for pre-
clinical trials.
Low efficiency
Off target cleavage
Inefficient intranuclear
delivery of HE and repair
matrix.
Safe Harbor
targeting
Targeting of specific and safe (ie,
far from oncogenes) loci in the
genome to introduce a normal
copy of the desired gene.
Safe and efficient insertion of
a normal copy of the desired
gene under any desired
promoter.
One system will work for
various defects and diseases.
Insertion of an extra copy of the
desired gene.
Does not utilize the natural
regulatory elements in the
endogenous locus.
Significant limitation for use in
dominant negative defects and
leaky phenotypes
Inefficient intranuclear
delivery of HE and repair
matrix.
Transposons
and
transposases
Use of transposase protein that
targets any DNA cargo sequence
flanked by ITR sequences for
random integration of a normal
copy of the desired gene
Efficient delivery and
insertion of large sequences
(up to 11 Kb).
One system will work for
various defects and diseases.
Random integration may lead to
insertional mutagenesis and/or
intragenic disruption.
Does not utilize the natural
regulatory elements in the
endogenous locus.
Significant limitation for use in
dominant negative defects and
leaky phenotypes
Inefficient intranuclear
delivery of HE and repair
matrix.

DSB: double-strand DNA break; ITR: inverted terminal repeats