Table 5.
Type of evidence | Elevated LDL-C | Elevated TRL, their remnants or low HDL-C |
---|---|---|
Human epidemiology | Direct association between LDL-C and CVD in numerous studies | Direct association between TG and CVD in numerous studies; association lost on correction for non-HDL-C and HDL-C in ERFC93 |
Strong inverse association between low HDL-C and CVD in numerous studies; association maintained after correction for TG and non-HDL-C in ERFC93 | ||
Mechanistic studies | Definitive mechanistic evidence; LDL accumulate in arterial intima and promote atherosclerosis | Arterial accumulation of TRL and their remnants to promote atherosclerosis like LDL, with potential pro-inflammatory and pro-thrombotic/anti-fibrinolytic effects |
In vitro and ex vivo evidence for potential anti-inflammatory vasculoprotective, anti-thrombotic and cytoprotective effects of HDL particles; central implication of cholesterol acceptor activity | ||
Animal models | Pro-atherogenic effect in numerous studies | Pro-atherogenic and pro-inflammatory effects for TRL and their remnants |
Atheroprotection exerted by elevated HDL or apo A-I levels | ||
Human genetic studies | Direct causal association in numerous studies, and notably in familial hypercholesterolaemia | Dysbetalipoproteinaemia (remnant hyperlipidaemia , apo E2/E2) provides causal evidence for the atherogenicity of elevated TRL and their remnants |
Lack of definitive insight for HDL-C, potentially due to the complexity of HDL metabolism | ||
Human intervention studies | Statin trials provided conclusive proof of causality | Imaging trials reveal that fibrate therapy may impact atherosclerosis progression but fails to slow intima–media thickening; see Supplementary material online, Table S2 |
Meta-analysis of fibrate trials (+statin) show clinical benefit limited to non-fatal CV events.208 Subgroup analyses reveal major reduction in CV events in patients with high TG and low HDL-C211 | ||
Niacin imaging trials showed consistent stabilization and/or regression of atherosclerosis or intima–media thickening in monotherapy or in combination; see Supplementary material online, Table S1 | ||
Reduction in CV events and total mortality with niacin monotherapy183,184 | ||
Interpretation 2010a | Definite causality | Evidence suggestive of a strong causal association of atherogenic dyslipidaemia, i.e. elevated TRL and their remnants combined with low HDL-C |
Insufficient evidence for TRL and their remnants alone | ||
Insufficient evidence for low HDL-C alone |
aFor an interpretation of causality given the data available in 2010, all five types of evidence should favour causality and all three types of human studies (epidemiology, genetics, and intervention trials) must be consistent; this is clearly the case for elevated LDL-C.