Skip to main content
. 2011 May;4(3):193–200. doi: 10.1177/1756285611405564

Table 1.

Summary of studies.

Drugs/Intervention Study/Series Number of participants enrolled Number of participants improved/primary endpoint fulfilled Notes
Steroids Dyck et al. [1982] Prednisone vs. no treatment 40 12 28 patients completed trial, n = 14 prednisone treated
Plasma exchange Dyck et al. [1986] Prospective double blinded 15 9 n = 15 (PE), n = 14 (sham)
Hahn et al. [1996] Double blind, sham controlled, crossover 18 12 15 participants completed trial
IVIg Hughes et al. [2008] Randomized, placebo-controlled 117 32 n = 59 IVIg, n = 58 placebo
Azathioprine Dalakas and Engel [1981] Case series 4 3 Steroid nonresponder
McCombe et al. [1987] Case series 7 4
Cyclophosphamide Good et al. [1998] Case series 15 11
Gladstone et al. [2005] Case series 5 4 Severe, refractory patients Long time follow up [range: 1.6–4.8 years]
Ciclosporine A Matsuda et al. [2004] 7 7
Barnett et al. [1998] Case series 19 15 Retrospective, relapsing and progressive course, patients refractory to steroid, IVIg, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, plasma exchange
Mycophenolate Mofetil Gorson et al. [2004] Case series 12 3 Retrospective, mean dose: 2.1 g/day
Umapathi and Hughes [2002] Case series 4 0 No reduction of steroids or other immunosuppressants
Rituximab Benedetti et al. [2011] Case series 13 9 Retrospective
Methotrexate RMC Trial Group [2009] Randomized, double-blind, controlled trial 60 28 Primary endpoint: 20% reduction of steroids or IVIg; n = 27 (MTX), n = 32 (Placebo)

MTX: methotrexate; PE: plasma exchange; IVIg: Intravenous immunoglobulin.