Table 2. Potential susceptibility of current methods to biases and other limitations for assessing protist community composition in environmental samples.
| PCR clones/454 tags | Metagenomics | qPCR | FISH | SAGs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sources of potential biases | |||||
| Cell permeability | + | + | + | + | + |
| Gene copy number | ++ | ++ | ++ | − | − |
| Primers and probes | ++ | − | ++ | ++ | + |
| Cloning efficiency | +/− | + | − | − | − |
| Ribosome number | − | − | − | + | − |
| Inadequate controls (false positives) | − | − | ++ | ++ | − |
| Other limitations | |||||
| Low phylogenetic resolution | +/++ | + | − | + | − |
| High cost per sample | − | + | + | ++ | + |
| Specialized equipment needed | −/+ | + | + | − | ++ |
Abbreviations: FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; qPCR, quantitative real-time; SAG, single amplified genome.
The susceptibility is designated as high (++), moderate (+) or absent (−).