Skip to main content
. 2010 Oct 21;5(4):674–684. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2010.155

Table 2. Potential susceptibility of current methods to biases and other limitations for assessing protist community composition in environmental samples.

  PCR clones/454 tags Metagenomics qPCR FISH SAGs
Sources of potential biases
 Cell permeability + + + + +
 Gene copy number ++ ++ ++
 Primers and probes ++ ++ ++ +
 Cloning efficiency +/− +
 Ribosome number +
 Inadequate controls (false positives) ++ ++
           
Other limitations
 Low phylogenetic resolution +/++ + +
 High cost per sample + + ++ +
 Specialized equipment needed −/+ + + ++

Abbreviations: FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; qPCR, quantitative real-time; SAG, single amplified genome.

The susceptibility is designated as high (++), moderate (+) or absent (−).