(A). Reflection scores as a function of experimental condition.
Participants displayed reliably higher reflection scores for described
vs. experienced problems (p<.001). (B). Reflection
scores on experienced and described trials as a function of block in the
experiment. On each block, reflection scores were higher for described
than for experienced trials. PT = pre-training
for the experienced trials, where feedback was obtained after each
trial. (C). Gambling quotient as a function of experimental condition
and choice type. For gains, participants were risk seeking for
experienced problems, but risk averse for described problems. In
contrast, for losses, participants were risk averse in experienced
problems, but nominally risk seeking in described problems. *
= p<.05. (D). Percentage
correct on catch trials as a function of experience training block.
Performance was relatively stable across test blocks, peaking at
100% on test block 5.