Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2011 Jun;13(3):226–239. doi: 10.1007/s11894-011-0182-z

Table 1.

Histologic response rates reported for studies of ablation of intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus

Study Sample size/type of dysplasia Length of follow-up Complete histologic IM eradication at first reported follow-up (%) Complete eradication dysplasia (%) Persistence of IM eradication after initial response (note that times to follow-up vary) Eradication of all BE at end of study (%)
MPEC
Sampliner et al. [25] 58 NDBE 6 mo 78% n/a n/a n/a
APC
Bright et al. [29] 40 no HGD
20 APC
20 surveillance
68 mo mean n/a n/a n/a At 5 y follow-up 40% (8/20) APC group had complete regression vs 20% (4/20) surveillance group
PDT
Ackroyd et al. [32] 36 LGD
18 PDT
18 placebo
24 mo No complete eradications (by design) 100% PDT in treated area
33% placebo
n/a n/a
Overholt et al. [10, 33] 208 HGD
138 PDT
70 omeprazole
24 mo and then 5 y 52% PDT
7% omeprazole
For all dysplasia:
59% PDT and 4% omeprazole
n/a n/a
For HGD:
77% PDT
39% omeprazole
Badreddine et al. [34] 363: 12 NDBE, 56 LGD, 190 HGD, 105 intramucosal carcinoma (EMR used with PDT in some) 36 mo median 48% overall (175/363) 72% (261/363) with reduction in dysplasia after PDT (unknown how many had complete eradication of dysplasia) Number with recurrent BE unknown; 83% without return of dysplasia n/a
APC vs Electrocoagulation
Dulai et al. [27] 52: 51 NDBE, 1 LGD
26 MPEC
26 APC
Unknown 81% MPEC
65% APC
n/a n/a n/a
Sharma et al. [28] 35: 32 NDBE, 3 LGD
16 MPEC
19 APC
2 y minimum Complete response 83% for both groups n/a 83% (24/29) After 2 y, 24/35 (68%) of patients had complete response (75% [12/16] MPEC, 63% ([12/19] APC)
PDT vs APC
Hage et al. [35] 40: 32 NDBE, 8 LGD
13 PDT single dose
12 PDT fractionated doses
14 APC
18 mo PDT single dose 8%
PDT fractionated doses 33%
APC 36%
n/a n/a PDT single dose 75%
PDT fractionated doses 88%
APC 67% (Some received additional APC following initial study treatment)
Kelty et al. [36] 68 NDBE
34 PDT
34 APC
12 mo median PDT 38%
APC 77%
n/a n/a n/a
RFA
Roorda et al. [40] 13: 6 NDBE, 4 LGD, 3 HGD 12 mo mean 46% (6/13) 71% (5/7) n/a n/a
Sharma et al. [37], Fleischer et al. [38, 39] 32 in dosimetry and 70 in effectiveness all NDBE 2.5 y and 5 y 59% (19/32) dosimetry
69% (48/70) effectiveness at 12 mo
n/a 2.5 y: 97% (60/62)
59 patients were treated with focal ablation during the follow-up period
5 y: 92% (46/50)
2.5 y: 86% (60/70)
59 patients were treated with focal ablation during the follow-up period
5 y: 66% (46/70)
Gondrie et al. [41] 11: 2 LGD, 9 HGD 14 mo median 100% 100% n/a n/a
Gondrie et al. [42] 12: 11 HGD, 1 LGD 14 mo median 100% 100% n/a n/a
Sharma et al. [43] 10 LGD 24 mo 70% at 1 year 90% at 1 year n/a 90% at 2 y (after additional ablations)
Hernandez et al. [44] 10: 7 NDBE, 2 LGD, 1 HGD 12 mo 70% n/a n/a n/a
Ganz et al. [46] 142 HGD 12 mo median 54% 80% n/a n/a
Sharma et al. [45] 63: 39 LGD, 24 HGD 24 mo median 79% 89% n/a n/a
Eldaif et al. [56] 27: 22 NDBE, 2 LGD 0 100% n/a n/a n/a
Shaheen et al. [9] 127: 64 with LGD and 63 with HGD
84 RFA
43 sham procedure
12 mo 77% RFA
2% sham control
90% RFA
23% sham control
n/a n/a
Velanovich et al. [48] 66: 12 HGD ? 59% n/a n/a 93% at 1 y (additional ablations between assessments)
Pouw et al. [47] 24
23 underwent endoscopic resection first
0 88% 95% n/a n/a
Vassiliou et al. [49] 15 with follow-up biopsies: 1 NDBE, 6 LDG, 15 HGD, 3 intramucosal carcinoma 20 mo median 73% ? n/a n/a
Cryospray
Johnston et al. [50] 11: varying degrees dysplasia 6 mo 78% 100% n/a n/a
Dumot et al. [51] 31 HGD or intramucosal adenocarcinoma 12 mo median 16% 33% n/a 3%
Shaheen et al. [57] 60 HGD (many had received previous therapy) 10.5 mo mean 57% 97% n/a n/a
EMR
Chennat et al. [31] 49 HGD and intramucosal carcinoma; 32 completed protocol 17 mo median 100% of the 32 who completed protocol 65% intention to treat 100% of the 32 who completed protocol 65% intention to treat 97% 63% intention to treat
Pouw et al. [54] 169 high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia or early cancer 32 mo median 89% 99% (all neoplasia eradicated) 88% 81%

APC—argon plasma coagulation; BE—Barrett's esophagus; EMR—endoscopic mucosal resection; HGD—high-grade dysplasia; IM—intestinal metaplasia; LGD—low-grade dysplasia; MPEC—multipolar electrocoagulation; n/a—not available; NDBE—nondysplastic Barrett's esophagus; PDT—photodynamic therapy; RFA—radiofrequency ablation