Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Obesity (Silver Spring). 2010 Dec 2;19(5):946–952. doi: 10.1038/oby.2010.287

Table 3.

Regression of school-related life events, the CAR, and their interaction on log VAT (N = 23)

Variable Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
b (95% CI) b (95% CI) b (95% CI)
Constant −2.23 (−3.39 to −1.08) −2.18 (−3.18 to −1.18) −2.75 (−3.82 to −1.68)
% Body fat 0.05* (0.01 to 0.09) 0.05** (0.01 to 0.09) 0.06** (0.02 to 0.09)
Tanner breast stageb 0.18 (−0.59 to 0.96) 0.07 (−0.61 to 0.74) 0.27 (−0.38 to 0.92)
School-related life eventsd 0.39* (0.10 to 0.68) 0.37 ** (0.10 to 0.63)
CARd 0.16 (−0.27 to 0.58) 0.11 (−0.28 to 0.50)
School-related life eventsd × CARd 0.43* (0.01 to 0.86)
R2 total 0.34 0.56 0.65
 ΔR2 0.34** 0.22** 0.09**

Model 1 includes percent body fat, and Tanner breast stage; model 2 includes percent body fat, Tanner breast stage, school-related life events, and CAR; model 3 includes percent body fat, Tanner breast stage, school-related life events, CAR, and the interaction of school-related life events and CAR.

CAR, cortisol awakening response; log VAT, visceral adipose tissue, natural log.

a

Standardized

b

Tanner breast stage 1 is the comparison group.

*

P < 0.05;

**

P < 0.01.