Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Geoinformatica. 2011 Jul;15(3):435–454. doi: 10.1007/s10707-010-0109-0

Table 2.

Names of adjacent counties that have significant boundary effects from the SAR model. The numbers in the first column are the ranks according to their BIC scores.

1 Cook, Lake
2 Itasca, Koochiching
3 Beltrami, Koochiching
4 Steele, Waseca
5 Pope, Stearns
6 Cass, Wadena
7 Todd, Wadena
8 Murray, Redwood
9 Traverse, Wilkin
10 Koochiching, Lake of the Woods
11 Freeborn, Steele
12 Isanti, Sherburne
13 Clearwater, Mahnomen
14 Renville, Yellow Medicine
15 Chippewa, Renville
16 Cottonwood, Murray
17 Isanti, Mille Lacs
18 Koochiching, St. Louis
19 Grant, Wilkin
20 Lyon, Redwood
21 Becker, Mahnomen
22 Cottonwood, Jackson
23 Lincoln, Pipestone
24 Goodhue, Olmsted
25 Cass, Morrison
26 Murray, Pipestone
27 Morrison, Todd
28 Redwood, Yellow Medicine
29 Jackson, Martin
30 Goodhue, Wabasha
31 Otter Tail, Todd
32 Douglas, Pope
33 Becker, Wadena
34 Brown, Renville
35 Kandiyohi, Pope
36 Benton, Morrison
37 Fillmore, Houston
38 Anoka, Isanti
39 Blue Earth, Brown
40 Hubbard, Wadena
41 Carver, McLeod
42 Clay, Otter Tail
43 Blue Earth, Watonwan
44 Mille Lacs, Morrison
45 Murray, Nobles
46 Dodge, Olmsted
47 Morrison, Stearns
48 Douglas, Grant
49 Dakota, Goodhue
50 Fillmore, Olmsted