Skip to main content
. 2011 Jun 2;7(6):e1002075. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002075

Figure 3. The phenotype-to-fitness map.

Figure 3

The plot shows the fit of our model for the phenotype-to-fitness map. The model assumes a gamma curve for the relationship between fitness and phenotype. Phenotypic effects were assumed to be additive and epistasis for fitness to arise through the shape of the curve. The variance of the normal error was estimated to be Inline graphic. Inline graphic gives the coefficient of determination. The Inline graphic value is based on an Inline graphic test comparing our model to a model assuming that single- and double-mutant fitnesses are independent of each other. For these data, Inline graphic. We rescaled fitness by substracting Inline graphic rather than the fitness of the wild type to avoid negative values.