Table 5.
Associations between “peer”, “scholastic” and “sport” factors and indicators of appearance (adjusted for gender).
| Peer status |
Scholastic status |
Sports status |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated marginal mean | F (sig) | Partial eta-squared | Estimated marginal mean | F (sig) | Partial eta-squared | Estimated marginal mean | F (sig) | Partial eta-squared | |
| Interviewer physical attractiveness rating | |||||||||
| (Very) good | .151 | .070 | .042 | ||||||
| Average | −.067 | −.023 | .022 | ||||||
| (Very) poor | −.284 | 29.4 (.000) | .020 | −.113 | 5.1 (.006) | .003 | −.177 | 6.2 (.002) | .004 |
| Interviewer physical maturity rating | |||||||||
| Below average | −.283 | −.013 | −.007 | ||||||
| About average | .022 | .003 | .023 | ||||||
| Above average | .093 | 17.0 (.000) | .011 | .031 | 0.3 (.772) | .000 | −.016 | 0.5 (.625) | .000 |
| Body mass categories (IOTF) | |||||||||
| Underweight | −.200 | .041 | .008 | ||||||
| Normal | .051 | .028 | .109 | ||||||
| Overweight | −.056 | −.076 | −.227 | ||||||
| Obese | −.218 | 7.8 (.000)* | .008 | .039 | 1.6 (.193) | .002 | −.457 | 32.3 (.000) | .032 |
* = Interaction with gender significant p < .01.