Skip to main content
. 2011 May 20;25(5):477–489. doi: 10.1007/s10822-011-9433-1

Table 5.

Autodock 3 performance with de novo solvent placement

PDB ID W top posea RMSD (Å) W+ top poseb RMSD (Å) W best pose ranka (RMSD (Å)) W+ best pose rankb (RMSD (Å)) W correct posesa in top 50 W+ correct posesb in top 50 W correct posesa in top 10 W+ correct posesb in top 10
1DBO 1.93 1.42 42 (1.27) 11 (1.06) 15 27 0 6
1OJN 2.90 1.37 8 (1.11) 2 (1.13) 6 9 4 6
1RWH 1.99 1.13 7 (0.97) 2 (0.87) 8 13 7 9
1G5N 4.41 4.28 29 (1.48) 27 (1.82) 5 5 1 1
1T8U 2.10 3.57 2 (1.84) 3 (2.27) 4 2 3 1
3E7J 1.79 1.20 1 (1.79) 1 (1.20) 5 3 2 3
2HYU 2.26 3.60 16 (1.91) 4 (2.29) 8 7 2 3
2BRS 2.77 3.01 34 (1.13) 15 (1.45) 8 16 0 8
1BFB 3.35 3.58 14 (1.88) 6 (2.31) 5 3 4 1
3IN9_1 3.54 2.75 32 (0.87) 34 (0.87) 20 16 0 2
3IN9_2 1.18 1.22 22 (0.99) 13 (0.85) 32 43 9 10
Mean 2.57 ± 0.93 2.47 ± 1.21 19 (1.39 ± 0.41) 11 (1.47 ± 0.60) 10.5 13.1 2.9 4.5

aDocking runs without explicit solvent

bDocking runs with explicit solvent