Skip to main content
. 2011 Jun;14(6):791–795. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2010.0313

Table 1.

Initial Case Assessments

Assessment parameter Case 1: “Ellen” Case 2: “Sarah” Case 3: “Karen”
Neuro/cognition Somewhat impaired, cognitively intact with limited sustained attention Fluctuating, from alert, anxious, cognition intact to somnolent, requiring maximal tactile/auditory stimulation to attend Intact, alert and oriented, cognition fully intact
Oral-motor Nonfunctional, few attempts to mouth words, poor articulation, unintelligible Moderately functional, few attempts to mouth words, imprecise articulation Functional, but minimal attempts to mouth words
Upper extremities Compromised, left hemiparesis and left neglect, moderately limited right upper arm control, unable to write Moderately compromised, deconditioned, tremulous, elbow support needed for pointing, difficulty grasping writing instrument, poor legibility Functional, gross/fine motor skills intact; able to write, type, point
Head control Adequate, but head-nods unclear at times Adequate, but head-nods unclear at times Intact, clear, consistent head-nods
Sensory Intact Sight compromised, glasses available but ill-fitting (able to read 24 pt font with glasses on) Sight compromised, unimpaired when glasses on
Breath support for phonation/speaking valve trials Initially poor phonation with speaking valve, overall intelligibility <25% in conversation N/A—No speaking valve trials due to deconditioning and medical acuity Vocal quality poor: 2/10
Language/literacy English/literate English/literate English/literate
Primary communication method/preference before SLP intervention Gestures—unclear and imprecise, often misinterpreted None noted—spiral notebook was tied to bedrail, but out of patient's reach Writing—notebook filled with patient's writing at bedside; legible
Communication needs Immediate medical needs, meaning of gestures Immediate medical needs, requests for family Novel messages